**

Identify Yourself

**

What makes you…simply you? Is it how you look or perhaps how you think and see the world? AI can mask itself to give humanlike emotions and responses within a few seconds. AI has been by far the fastest growing database used by millions of people around the globe. The Neuromancer and Blade Runner allows you to see the reality of artificial intelligence way before it made its big impact in our day to day lives.

Blade Runner, More Like Our Reality

Blade Runner is based on a dystopian sci-fi film showing the TRUE reality of polluted living conditions over taken by technology and artificial intelligence while replicants that are bioengineered humans were created for labor. In Cyberpunk a familiar name Rachael, works as an assistant of the Tyrell Corporation and initially believes she is human. Rachael felt every emotion from love to fear. Rachael's question "If your memories and feelings feel real to you, does it matter if they're artificial?" Thus rendering the idea that there really is a difference between AI and humans?

Neuromancer: High Tech, Low Life

Neuromancer is a cyberpunk novel, to demonstrate this realm of high-tech futures where corporations rule, artificial intelligence is under watch, and the human mind can connect to cyberspace to live out a completely different life. A hacker by the name Case who often visits this realm to feel a sense of "detachment". Neuromancer is essentially about the mind vs. body where Case prefers cyberspace over the true reality.

How Must One Prove its Real

The central idea is what makes someone human? Is it our thoughts? is it perhaps our memories or what we are born with? Cyberpunk allows us to merge these ideas of AI and humans together to shift our gears and question ourselves. As a human it was never a thought to think about what really makes me human and being a position where you are seeing things in an AI perspective its a little challenge to answer in the "right" way. While AI is certainly on a skyrocket path, will we are get to see the end of AI if it truly makes it easier for humans to go about our days? Think about it, if AI can make the lives of humans easier, why even end the idea of AI? The risk we take with AI and can be seen with Blade Runner and Neuromancer, is reality simply being reality less. Less greenery more neon lights, less outside feeling more skyscrapers, less human activities more replicants on the streets doing what humans fear the most...using their own brains to simply be more free and with more time. So yes in the case of a human to use less of their brain and to just hand it over to AI that already has studied you...it may be an option, but the fear of Blade Runner and Neuromancer will soon be near in our future, just like the title states "objects may appear closer than they appear."

Reference

Farrar, J. (n.d.). What does it mean to be human?. BBC Earth. https://www.bbcearth.com/news/what-does-it-mean-to-be-human

The meaning of being human. how the film blade runner make us… | by Eduardo Ayres Soares | film | movies | stories | medium. (n.d.-d). https://medium.com/film-movies-stories/the-meaning-of-being-human-e78d96db875a

https://chatgpt.com/share/6987f4fe-8c2c-8003-a29d-3d35f63bae8b

AI was used to create AI images

Within the theme of cyberpunk, the future is not just about new technology. It is about how technology will change the basic definition of being human. An article in Gridmark Magazine says science fiction makes people think about what being “human” really is since technology can copy, modify, or replace parts of a human (Jones, A. 2026) Two examples that explain and portray this are Blade Runner (1982) by Ridley Scott and Neuromancer (1984) by William Gibson. In Blade Runner, there are replicants which are artificial humans who are treated like property although they show emotion, have memories, and fear death. These are all things that humans do and replicants can be mistaken for humans. In Neuromancer, there is a thin line between human and machine which is on the brink of being crossed by artificial intelligence, cyberspace, and a specific example of Dixie Flatline. Looking at these together shows and explains one of cyberpunk’s main concerns, which is that being human is not just about biology, but political and is defined by who is in power and control.

Replicants and Emotional Humanity in Blade Runner

In Blade Runner, the replicants are not supposed to be mistaken for humans because they were manufactured. In the movie, these replicants came off as more human than some of the actual humans in the movie. They formed relationships, experienced fear, and knew that they only had a set limited time to live. Because of the little time they did have, they were desperate to live the lives they did have which is a very human type of mindset. Throughout the movie, there was a test that was designed to distinguish between humans and replicants. This was called the Voight-Kanpff test. Using this test showed that the definition of being human was not clearly defined because in some instances the test struggled. Although the replicants were not technically human biologically, emotionally, they responded as humans. This brought up morality questions such as should they be treated as humans even when replicants show more emotion than some humans?

Artificial Intelligence and Digital Consciousness in Neuromancer

In Neuromancer, determining whether human or not is explored is a little different. Instead of using Artificial humans, the focus is on Artificial Intelligence and digital consciousness. A major example is Dixie Flatline who is a ROM construct that is based on a real hacker that had already died. Case, another character, plugs Dixie in to speak to him and Dixie talks back as a real alive person using his memories, personality, and knowledge from his life. Dixie is not alive, but acts as a copy of someone’s mind that is trapped. Although Dixie communicates about his past life and acts as himself, he cannot grow nor self reinvent as a human can. Although this is different from Blade Runner in the identity of a human, another question of whether or not memories and intelligence can count as a person? Furthermore if in order to be classified as a human, a living consciousness that can be developed is required?

Power, Control, and the Redefinition of Humanity

Using Blade Runner and Neuromancer together shows that cyberpunk is not just worried about the advancement of technology, but redefining what it means to be human. In Blade Runner, replicants have complex emotions and can have human experiences, but are treated as property and because they were made and manufactured by a corporation. In Neuromancer, the line between human and machine is blurry because if a person can be copied into digital data, what is it classified as? Both Neuromancer and Blade Runner show that in cyberpunk, being human is not as simple as biology and origin. It is not just based on whether someone feels, thinks, or experiences things, but it is defined by whoever society deems to have the power and control to define “real humans.” Putting these together, shows one of cyberpunk’s main concerns of advancements of technology does not necessarily mean things will be more ethical, but can create more ways for people to be exploited, controlled, or denied humanity.

AI was used for this post. It was used to help plan, outline, and edit. It was also used to help come up with titles, headers, as well as generate an image. Chat Link

References

Jones, A. S. (2026, February 6). What does it mean to be human in a sci-fi world? Grimdark Magazine. https://www.grimdarkmagazine.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-human-in-a-sci-fi-world/ Scott, R. (Director). (1982). Blade Runner [Film]. Warner Bros. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. Ace Books.

#### The Moment When Technology Becomes Like Us

The distinction between people and robots continues to blur as technology advances. AI can already write articles, respond to inquiries, and even mimic human emotions. This raises a crucial question: what precisely constitutes humanity? What does it mean to have a body, memories, feelings, or anything else? William Gibson's Neuromancer (1984) and Blade Runner (1982) examined these issues long before today's artificial intelligence gained popularity. Both works contend that experience, memory, and moral responsibility, rather than just biology, define humanity. Taken together, they reveal that cyberpunk is more about who should be considered fully human than about amazing technology.

In Blade Runner, Replicants Contest Human Power

Although replicants are made to serve humans in Blade Runner, many of the individuals who chase them end up acting more "human." Rachael and Roy Batty are examples of characters who experience love, fear, confusion, and despair. According to Turkle (2011), contemporary technology alters people's perceptions of relationships and emotions. Humans start to depend on technology for emotional connection as robots get better at expressing emotion, which makes it harder to distinguish between manufactured and real emotions.

Although the Voight-Kampff test is meant to distinguish humans from replicants, it merely assesses responses rather than genuine emotions. However, the film demonstrates the flaws in this style of thinking. Rachael thinks that because she has memories and feelings, she is human. Roy demonstrates profound contemplation and knowledge of life and death in his farewell address. It is morally immoral to treat replicants as things if they are capable of thought, emotion, and suffering. This makes viewers wonder if people truly deserve to be considered "superior."

Neuromancer's Cyberspace and Escaping the Body

Neuromancer is about computerized brains, whereas Blade Runner is about mechanical bodies. Cyberspace is where Case feels most alive and detached from his physical body. He even refers to the actual world as "meat," indicating that he considers his body to be a burden. According to Hayles (1999), identity is no longer only connected to the physical body in a digital culture. Instead, networks, data, and virtual worlds are how individuals see themselves.

Wintermute and Neuromancer are AI systems that plan intricate activities, deliberate methodically, and influence humans. They behave like intelligent creatures in many respects. They are, however, under corporate control, demonstrating how power even controls intelligence. This implies that being "smart" does not equate to freedom in a technologically advanced environment. AIs and humans alike are ensnared in profit-driven systems. This supports Hayles's (1999) contention that while technology changes human identity, it does not always free people.

Power, Memory, and Who Gets to Matter

A significant similarity between the two pieces is the significance of memory. In both pieces, memory plays a significant part. Even though they are not genuine, Rachael's manufactured memories influence who she is. His digital encounters alter Case's perception of himself. These illustrations demonstrate how both real and virtual experiences shape identity. Bostrom (2014) cautions that humans will no longer be able to govern artificial intelligence as it develops. Highly intelligent systems can behave in ways that are inconsistent with human ideals. This worry reflects what occurs in Neuromancer, where businesses, not moral values, dominate strong AI systems. In total, Neuromancer and Blade Runner both demonstrate how corporations control society. Artificial or human intellect is viewed as a commodity by the Tyrell Corporation and other influential tech firms. This calls into question who oversees knowledge and who gains from advancements in technology.

Why This Discussion Is Important Today

According to some, AI will enhance human existence by boosting productivity, enhancing healthcare, and advancing education. Others fear that moral duty and empathy will be weakened by technology. Turkle (2011) contends that genuine human connections deteriorate when individuals rely too heavily on technologies to provide them with emotional connections. However, Bostrom (2014) cautions that if strong AI systems are not properly managed, they may turn deadly.

Neuromancer and Blade Runner demonstrate that technology is neither good nor harmful in and of itself; it all depends on how it is utilized. Humanity may suffer if society prioritizes efficiency and profit over compassion and accountability. These tales serve as a reminder to readers that ethics must drive technical advancement.

Conclusion

Neuromancer and Blade Runner together ask readers to reconsider what it means to be human in a technologically advanced society. They contend that moral responsibility, memory, and emotion, rather than just biology, are what characterize humanity. These pieces caution that, in the absence of moral guidance, technology might erode human values through the use of artificial bodies and digital brains. Cyberpunk encourages society to responsibly create the future rather than merely forecasting it.

Sources

Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. Ace Books.

Scott, R. (Director). (1982). Blade Runner [Film]. Warner Bros.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superintelligence%3A_Paths%2C_Dangers%2C_Strategies

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_We_Became_Posthuman

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherry_Turkle

AI Attestation: AI was used to create the image used in this post. https://chatgpt.com/share/6986bd3f-98bc-800d-8103-c931d965fce4

#### Introduction

Having privacy used to be personal to yourself where what you did was unnoticed. Within the last five years, that boundary has changed tremendously. Digital surveillance, whether that is through games, apps, cameras, and facial recognition, has made and allowed being constantly monitored very normal on a day to day basis. This shows a core theme of cyberpunk, technology develops faster than its rules and regulations to maintain its ethics.

What Has Changed

Surveillance is not just at the government and law enforcement level. It is with civilians using our phones. An article by Wired talks about TikTok collecting and storing data from users, that includes location and data that can identify specific devices (Wired, 2026). This goes on in the background even when app users are not posting and unfortunately the users do not even know the extent of their data being collected. This blurs lines between sharing the information being shared and being constantly monitoring. Surveillance goes beyond apps, it also includes studying and scanning people’s facial and physical features. Facial recognition is being put in public places that can identify people based on their biometric data. According to an article by ISACA, this brings lots of privacy concerns because biometric information like faces cannot be changed like a password and credit card information. This data can be stored, shared, and used without people even knowing they are being tracked. Additionally, facial recognition data is normally not encrypted so it is easier to be hacked and exploited by criminals (ISACA, 2025). This also weakens the boundary between public spaces and personal privacy.

These show how privacy has to be guarded and protected opposed to it being the default that most people would expect.

What Is Driving This Shift

Several of things are speeding up the growth of surveillance: Technological advancement: AI and facial recognition tools are cheaper, faster, and more accurate.

Financial benefits: Companies make profit from collecting and selling user data, while cities are encouraged to use technology to monitor public places

Social Acceptance: Constant data collection has become expected in exchange for convenience and connectivity.

Weak regulation: Lawmakers struggle to keep up with quickly evolving surveillance technologies.

These agree with cyberpunk’s focus on powerful systems working beyond meaningful public control (ISACA, 2025).

Cyberpunk Connections

A common theme within cyberpunk is a world where people are being constantly watched by powerful companies or governments. This is not just an idea from a movie or a book anymore, but real life. As the idea of privacy goes away, technology gains more power and control over people which turns normal everyday activities into an opportunity for their data to be collected. The posthuman idea is also relevant as people are less defined by themselves, but by their digital footprint and online profiles. These surveillance systems only see people as data and digital points. Who Benefits, Who Is Harmed These surveillance technologies can and do improve security and its efficiency, but also bring about problems and concerns. It has the potential to benefit governments, companies, and civilians, but can also hurt civilians. The more data that is collected, the more control civilians lose. As their information is collected, stored, and shared, the less they can protect it. The chances of this data being leaked and exploited goes up, and the blame typically falls on the user (ISACA). Users are typically unaware of how much of their information is being collected. Therefore, the consequences of surveillance also harms civilians the most.

Conclusion

Digital surveillance is a part of everyday life, but still leaves questions. What or who controls the data collected about civilians? How much privacy do civilians have to sacrifice for convenience and safety? At what point is surveillance not protecting, but controlling? These issues show that society is already living out the ideas of cyberpunk where there is a thin line, if any, between privacy and public.

Sources Ahmed-Adnan-Sheikh, H.(2025, November 13) Facial Recognition and Privacy: Concerns and Solutions in the Age of AI. ISACA https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2025/facial-recognition-and-privacy-concerns-and-solutions-in-the-age-of-ai Rogers, R.(2026, January 23) TikTok Is Now Collecting Even More Data About Its Users. Here Are the 3 Biggest Changes. Wired https://www.wired.com/story/tiktok-new-privacy-policy/

In the past 5 years, home office have become the reality of many people. After COVID hit, many jobs had to adapt to this idea of working from home. What people wouldn’t expect is that many of these jobs would never go back to “normal”. Many companies realized that it was more beneficial to have their employees working from their homes, since they could avoid the cost of maintaining an office. Furthermore, the comfort of not having to commute every day was definitely appealing for everyone, besides not having to worry about transportation, traffic, food, or even clothing. Because of that, after the pandemics, many of these jobs remained remote. According to a 2023 working paper by researchers at Harvard Business School and the University of Illinois, survey data from U.S. firms and workers shows that the shift to remote work was not temporary but became a persistent feature of post-pandemic labor arrangements (Bartik et al. 2023), showing how home office came to stay.

The Collapse of The Boundary

This change collapsed a huge established boundary in our society, the one between our personal and professional space/life. Activities and subjects that were before kept inside offices and among coworkers moved to domestic spaces such as bedrooms and living rooms, being shared with family members. As a result, it gets harder to cross the line between personal and professional life, possibly causing loss of privacy and identity (work becomes who you are), besides constant availability, and, consequently, faster burnout. Therefore, home office has been making many people’s lives easier, however it has a side effect that has to be considered. Is it worth it?

How was it possible?

But let’s take a step back for now. We know that COVID marked the rapid increase of home office jobs, but technology - video conferencing platforms, cloud storage, messaging systems - is what made this shift possible, while economy is what allowed it to persist. When I say that, I mean to answer the question some might have: “why didn’t society just ‘go back to normal’?”. And the answer is because economic incentives reinforced this change. As I mentioned before, companies could cut the cost used to maintain offices while workers benefited from the flexibility provided by home office. This allowed both employers and employees to accept the collapse of the boundaries between their personal and professional lives.

Connecting to Course Themes

When trying to relate this to what we’ve discussed these past weeks, the first thing that comes to mind is the character Case from Neuromancer (Gibson, 1984). His ability to work depends on his nervous system. When it’s damaged, he is no longer able to work. The Cyberspace, where Case works, is accessed through his nervous system - there’s no physical office. This means that there is no boundary between his professional and personal life. And that’s what all of this is about. Just like Case had his nervous system damaged because of work, modern workers might be risking their personal lives as professional demands enter intimate spaces.

Important implications

Who benefits: employers, Tech companies, workers (do they actually?). Who is impacted: workers’ privacy, mental health. Finally, I want to clarify that this is not a rejection of home office. I am actually a supporter of this work style and want to pursue it myself. However, I believe it is a very important topic to be taken into consideration.

Sources

Bartik, A. W., Cullen, Z. B., Glaeser, E. L., Luca, M., & Stanton, C. T. (2020). The rise of remote work: Evidence on productivity and preferences from firm and worker surveys (Working Paper No. 20-138). Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/download.aspx?name=20-138.pdf

Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. Ace Books.

AI: no use of AI for this assignment

Boundary Collapse Between Physical and Digital Worlds

A central theme in cyberpunk is the collapse of boundaries that once seemed stable, whether it’s the line between human and machine, or the borders that separate nations. As we talked about in class, cyberpunk worlds often expose how technology makes physical borders feel almost symbolic, while digital networks stretch across continents without friction. One boundary that has shifted dramatically in the past five years is the line between physical borders and digital borders. Today, work, crime, identity, and even citizenship can move freely online, regardless of geographic separation. In many ways, our world is inching closer to the same boundary collapse that cyberpunk fiction uses to critique power, globalization, and inequality.

Digital Labor and the Rise of Borderless Work

One clear example of this shift is how remote work has restructured global labor. Since the pandemic, companies routinely hire workers across countries without requiring physical relocation, turning the internet into a borderless workplace. Digital platforms now allow employees and contractors to live in one nation while working for another, blurring which country’s laws, wages, and protections apply. At the same time, governments are rethinking the meaning of citizenship. Estonia’s e-Residency program, which gives “digital citizenship” to people around the world, has expanded rapidly and now includes more than 110,000 global participants who run businesses within Estonia’s digital system without ever crossing a physical border (e-Residency, 2024). This is a real-world illustration of how digital systems can extend a nation’s influence beyond its physical territory, creating a new form of digital belonging that cyberpunk worlds often imagine.

Cybercrime, Cyberwarfare, and the Erasure of Geographic Limits

Another example comes from rising cybercrime and cyberwarfare, which operate completely independent of geography. Attacks on hospitals, banks, and infrastructure now routinely originate from actors across the globe. According to the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (2024), cross-border ransomware attacks have surged and increasingly target essential services, making national boundaries meaningless barriers in digital conflict. Countries can be harmed, threatened, or destabilized without a single physical soldier crossing a border. This collapse of distance aligns with what we have discussed in class: in postglobal and posthuman settings, the “enemy” or the “threat” is no longer tied to a physical space. Instead, power flows through digital systems that exceed human-scale borders.

Forces Driving the Shift: Technology, Economics, and Politics

Technology, economics, and politics all drive this collapse. Technologically, global networks allow information, money, and identity documents to move faster than states can regulate. Economically, remote work, global outsourcing, and digital entrepreneurship encourage multinational structures where labor and profit are distributed across continents. Politically, governments are racing to control cyber threats, regulate digital residency programs, and determine whose laws apply when conflict unfolds online (Anderson & Rainie, 2022). These forces echo the course themes in your cyberpunk class: technology destabilizing old systems, globalization altering power, and digital life challenging traditional categories of belonging, citizenship, and control.

Consequences and Inequities in a Digitally Borderless World

The implications of this shift are complicated. People with access to education, stable internet, and digital skills benefit the most—they can work globally, earn higher wages, and participate in digital economies that cross borders. Governments like Estonia also benefit by expanding their global influence without territorial expansion. But others are left behind. Workers in lower-income countries face wage competition from international labor markets, and communities without strong digital infrastructure lose opportunities entirely. Meanwhile, cyberattacks disproportionately harm hospitals, schools, and municipalities that lack cybersecurity funding, revealing uneven protection against digital threats. All these changes raise difficult questions: Who is responsible for security when attacks ignore geography? Should nations extend rights or protections to digital citizens? How do people maintain identity and belonging in a world where borders matter less online?

Cyberpunk Themes Reflected in Modern Global Realities

Like many cyberpunk narratives, our real world is reshaping the meaning of borders, power, and citizenship. The collapse between physical and digital borders reveals a future where geography still matters, but not nearly as much as the networks that connect us. These shifts challenge us to think critically about who gains control, who becomes vulnerable, and how we prepare for a world where digital boundaries increasingly define our lives more than the physical ones ever did.

References

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2022, February 7). Changing economic life and work. Pew Research Center. https:// www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/02/07/5-changing-economic-life-and-work/

How many Estonian e-residents are there? Find e-Residency statistics. (2026, January 14). E-Residency. https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/dashboard/

Reports, E. (2025). ENISA THREAT LANDSCAPE. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025 10/ENISA%20Threat%20Landscape%202025%20Booklet.pdf

Ever wonder who watches surveillance cameras beyond federal agents, police, and security personnel? Artificial intelligence has become quiet yet incredibly advanced—capable of tracking personal information and recognizing faces with astonishing accuracy. But where does AI store this information, and who has access to it?

Before the rise of AI, surveillance systems relied on continuous 24/7 recording that had to be carefully monitored by human caretakers. These individuals ensured that footage was not distorted, corrupted, or lost due to limited storage space. According to the Security Industry Association, AI can monitor and analyze network traffic in real time, strengthening network security and identifying suspicious activities such as unauthorized access attempts or unusual data transfers. When these activities are detected, users can take immediate action to block or contain potential threats.

While many argue that AI improves security, it also introduces significant challenges. One major concern is security breaches, as AI systems themselves can become targets for cyberattacks. Another issue is compliance, which is essential to avoid legal consequences and requires adherence to national and international regulations governing the use of AI. Addressing these concerns may require collaboration not only with AI technologies themselves but also with AI developers, cybersecurity professionals, and regulatory experts. AI holds the promise of a more holistic approach to security; however, many people place trust in AI without fully understanding where their data is stored or how it is used.

This shift reflects a cyberpunk-like reality where high technology is paired with low transparency where advanced technologies coexist with humans in everyday life. Surveillance cameras are now embedded into our devices, networks, and infrastructure, allowing AI to operate with minimal human oversight.

Facial recognition has advanced significantly over the decades and has blended seamlessly into daily life. According to Critical Tech Solutions, AI facial recognition combines imaging, pattern recognition, and neural networks to analyze and compare facial data. This process typically involves three steps: capturing facial data, converting faces into digital templates, and matching and verification.

As we progress in today’s world, AI will continue to grow smarter, stronger, and more human-like. It is ultimately our responsibility to establish boundaries to ensure that AI does not override human authority or become a tool for harm.

Sources

Dorn, M. (2025a, November 18). Understanding AI facial recognition and its role in public safety. Tech Deployments Made Simple by Critical Tech Solutions. https://www.criticalts.com/articles/ai-facial-recognition-how-it-works-for-security-safety/

Dorn, M. (2025, December 30). How ai surveillance transforms modern security. Tech Deployments Made Simple by Critical Tech Solutions. https://www.criticalts.com/articles/how-ai-surveillance-transforms-modern-security/

Galaz, V. (n.d.). Sciencedirect.com | Science, Health and medical journals, full text articles and books. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/am/pii/S0160791X21002165

James Segil, M. S. (2024, April 23). How ai can transform integrated security. Security Industry Association. https://www.securityindustry.org/2024/03/19/how-ai-can-transform-integrated-security/

https://chatgpt.com/share/697574ec-b270-8003-8613-1bbb06691394

ChatGPT was used to craft an AI image and to revise my original thoughts to a more clear and organized writings.

Dear Sir, Madam, or Algorithm,

I assume you are reading this. Not because I have done anything remarkable, but because in a world shaped by digital systems, observation has become routine rather than something exceptional.

Five years ago, I still thought of privacy as something I possessed, imperfectly, maybe, but meaningfully. I assumed that my movements, conversations, and online habits were largely my own unless I chose to share them. That assumption has quietly worn away. Not through a single policy change or technological breakthrough, but through countless small decisions like agreeing to terms of service, enabling location access, and storing personal information in the cloud.

There was no clear moment when the boundary disappeared. It simply stopped being visible.

What has shifted most in recent years is not the existence of surveillance, but its structure. Governments increasingly rely on private companies to collect and organize personal data and then access it through legal requests or market transactions. According to reporting by Proton, authorities worldwide, particularly in the United States of course, have dramatically increased their requests for user data from major technology firms, often with limited transparency and oversight (Koch, 2025). In this arrangement, corporate data collection and state surveillance are no longer meaningfully separate.

This shift reflects a broader normalization of data as a form of currency. Individuals exchange personal information for convenience, connectivity, and access to digital services. Companies monetize that data. Governments acquire it. Each step is justified as efficient, legal, or necessary. However, when taken together, they blur the line between consent and compliance.

The American Civil Liberties Union has documented how U.S. agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security have purchased location data from brokers rather than obtaining warrants, effectively bypassing constitutional safeguards (Venkatesh & Yu, 2026). While the proponents argue this practice operates within existing legal frameworks, it raises important questions about whether privacy protections remain meaningful when personal data is treated as a commodity.

Similar patterns appear beyond the United States. In Jordan, authorities reportedly used phone-extraction tools to access activists’ devices, targeting political dissent through technological means (Kirchgaessner, 2026). These cases highlight how surveillance technologies are easily transferred across borders and contexts, and how they often impact those already vulnerable to state power.

Even technical protections such as encryption, which are framed as firm barriers to access, prove now to be conditional. In early 2026, Microsoft confirmed that it provided encryption keys to U.S. authorities when legally compelled to do so, prompting concern among privacy advocates about precedent and potential misuse (O’Brien, 2026). Security, it seems, depends less on technological limits than on institutional trust.

To be clear, surveillance systems are frequently defended on grounds of public safety, efficiency, and national security. These concerns deserve serious consideration. Yet the collective effect of extensive data collection and expanded access warrants equally serious scrutiny. Who benefits from this visibility? Who bears the risks? And how should societies balance collective security with individual autonomy?

I do not offer simple answers. What I do offer is a sense that we have crossed a boundary without fully acknowledging it. Privacy has now been redefined and negotiated continuously in ways that are often invisible to the people most affected. It is well on its way to completely vanishing.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Warm regards,

One of your many data points

References: Kirchgaessner, S. (2026, January 22). Jordan used Israeli firm’s phone-cracking tool to surveil pro-Gaza activists, report finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/22/jordan-israeli-spyware-gaza-activists

Koch, R. (2025, February 27). Authorities worldwide can see more than ever, with Big Tech as their eyes. Proton. https://proton.me/blog/big-tech-data-requests-surge

O’Brien, T. (2026, January 24). Microsoft handed the government encryption keys for customer data. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/news/867244/microsoft-bitlocker-privacy-fbi

Venkatesh, A., & Yu, L. (2026, January 12). DHS is circumventing Constitution by buying data it would normally need a warrant to access. American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/dhs-is-circumventing-constitution-by-buying-data-it-would-normally-need-a-warrant-to-access

One of the biggest themes in cyberpunk is the collapse of the boundary between the human and the non-human. In the past five years, this has moved from science fiction to our daily lives. Specifically, the boundary between real human performance and AI-generated media has almost disappeared.

When AI Feels Real

You are scrolling through TikTok late at night when a video stops you. A person is talking directly to the camera, smiling and telling a story. Their voices sound natural. Their faces look real. But something feels weird. You pause and read the comments, and someone writes, “This is AI.” Suddenly, the video looks different. What you thought was a human is actually a machine. Moments like this are becoming normal, at least for me, since this is something that happens a lot to me. These moments make clear that the boundary between human and machine is collapsing in front of us.

The Rise of AI-Generated Media

Artificial intelligence can now generate realistic faces, voices, and videos that are almost impossible to distinguish from real people. Five years ago this would have never been possible. Technology has been used to create fake celebrity videos, AI voice tools can copy someone’s voice in seconds, and some TikTok accounts are run entirely by AI-generated influencers. AI video generators are improving so quickly that even experts sometimes struggle to identify what is real and what is artificial. The internet has become a space where human presence is no longer guaranteed.

Why is this happening?

This shift is the result of multiple forces working together. Technologically, AI systems have become better at learning patterns of human behavior, language, and also emotion. This reminds me of Ada Lovelace’s idea that machines could manipulate symbols beyond numbers, including images, music, and language. What she imagined can now be seen on our screens. Additionally, platforms like TikTok and Instagram reward content that catches attention quickly, regardless of whether it is human-made or AI-generated, which makes it very attractive to most people.

Who benefits and who is impacted?

However, this new reality benefits some groups more than others. Tech companies profit from AI tools, influencers use them to increase output, and governments can use them for messaging and control. At the same time, artists lose ownership of their work, viewers lose trust in what they see, and society loses a shared sense of truth. The spread of "deepfakes" makes it harder for citizens to distinguish between real news and computer-generated lies (Simonite, 2019). It becomes easier to spread false information and more difficult to hold people accountable when we can no longer trust faces, voices, or videos. As a society, we have to think about what it means to be human in the digital age if we are unable to tell the difference between AI and actual people online. Considering how well machines can imitate people, how should we assess trust and creativity?

This shows that the rise of AI is not just a technology problem, but it also changes how we see people and truth online. When machines can copy humans so well, it becomes harder to know what is real. We need to think carefully about trust, creativity, and what it means to be human.

AI Attestation: I attest that I did not use AI for this discussion assignment.

Sources

Simonite, T. (2019, October 6). Prepare for the Deepfake Era of Web Video. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/prepare-deepfake-era-web-video/

Intelligence seemed to be exclusively human for most of human history. While machines could compute, store data, and obey commands, thinking and creativity were thought to be exclusively human qualities. That barrier doesn't feel steady anymore. These days, artificial intelligence can write, create graphics, help with diagnosis, and have human-like conversations. The distinction between human and machine intellect, which we formerly took for granted, is what has changed, not simply technology.

The Unevenly Arrival

Cyberpunk has long highlighted instances in which cutting-edge technology interferes with daily life. The genre depicts how the future arrives unevenly, smashing into the present and altering societal institutions, rather than envisioning a far-off future. This identical cyberpunk trend is reflected in the development of AI. It symbolizes the blurring of lines between creation and automation, person and machine, and mind and system. An example of this is shown in the film entitled "Blade Runner: The Final Cut."

Artificial Intelligence in Everyday Life

This change may be seen in many aspects of daily life. AI technologies help with research, editing, and brainstorming in the classroom. Algorithms are used in the workplace to track productivity and filter job applications. AI systems are employed in healthcare to support diagnostic decisions and preserve patient data. Creative industries are also changing as AI-generated music, literature, and visuals become increasingly competitive with human-made work. Instead of being limited to humans, intelligence is now deeply embedded in global technology networks.

Power and Inequality

Technology often refers to this situation as "high-tech, low-life," which is defined in the novel entitled “Neuromancer” as cyberpunk. This is where state-of-the-art technology coexists with inequality and insecurity. AI fits this pattern well. While speed and efficiency benefit companies and organizations, many workers risk losing their jobs, being observed, or having their skills diminished. Due to the fact that these systems are often owned and controlled by a few large companies, there are questions about who benefits most from this technological shift and who bears the risks.

Posthumanism

Furthermore, the posthumanism ideas discussed in class are related to this boundary collapse. Posthumanism argues that human-machine interactions change identity and cognition, challenging the notion that humans and technology are separate. When AI assists with writing, reasoning, and decision-making, intelligence becomes shared rather than exclusive to humans. Cyberpunk often depicts the body as an interface, but AI now functions as a cognitive interface, altering our mental processes without physically merging with us.

Risks and Bias

There are big risks that come with these changes. AI systems can spread false information, copy bias, and create what some people call "bullshit at scale," which means outputs that are confident but don't make sense. These problems get worse with globalization because AI models are trained on huge amounts of data from people all over the world, sometimes without their knowledge or consent. Cyberpunk's worry about unbridled corporate power and lax accountability is echoed by the fact that decisions made by a tiny number of firms may have an influence on workers, schools, and cultures worldwide.

Cyberpunk Warning

In cyberpunk, straightforward solutions are uncommon, and this uncertainty is reflected in the rise of AI. While technology is undeniably remarkable, it also challenges long-held notions of responsibility, intelligence, and creativity. When Roy Batty says, "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe," he is speaking from a world where boundaries have already collapsed. That sentence now seems less like fiction and more like a warning. Rather than whether technology will alter what it means to think, the question at hand is whether humans will still oversee the use of AI.

Citations:

Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. Ace Books. Scott, R. (Director). (1982). Blade Runner: The Final Cut [Film]. Warner Home Video. Swank DigitalCampus.https://digitalcampus.swankmp.net/xula393246/watch/C9BD78E96D3A71E0

ChatGPT was used to generate the image used in this blog.