Reading Time: 2 minutes

I find it fascinating to think about where corporations might be headed, especially when I compare our contemporary world with the fictional examples from Blade Runner, Neuromancer, and Machinehood. These works present unsettling images of the future, but how far-fetched are they, really?

Take the Tyrell Corporation from Blade Runner, for example. Tyrell’s monopoly on bio-engineered humans, or replicants, creates a world where one company controls both life and technology without any real accountability. It’s a portrayal of unchecked corporate power that dehumanizes individuals for profit. When I look at some modern corporations, I can’t help but draw parallels—there are certainly times when profit seems to trump ethics, especially in cases where companies disregard the impact of their products or practices on people and the environment. The power dynamics feel eerily similar.

Then there’s the Tessier-Ashpool family from Neuromancer. They represent a corporate dynasty that wields technology and genetic engineering to consolidate power across generations. The Tessier-Ashpools blur the line between humanity and corporate control, introducing the concept of a transhumanist elite. I can’t ignore the parallel to today’s tech giants who hold significant influence over our lives and privacy. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Meta come to mind—they might not be splicing genes, but they are deeply embedded in our personal lives and have significant control over our data, the media we consume, and even our choices. It’s easy to imagine this concentration of power growing in the future if left unchecked.

The “pill funders” in Machinehood are another interesting example. These funders use biotechnology to enhance human abilities, controlling society through their grip on this technology. What strikes me here is how this setup could create a new elite, where only the wealthiest can afford the advancements that ensure continued dominance. In our world, I see glimpses of this in the rising biotech and AI industries, where those with financial access to cutting-edge healthcare and tech enhancements are likely to stay at the top.

When I think about the future, I do see echoes of these sci-fi worlds. But, honestly, I’m not sure we’ll fully get there. As much as technology is advancing, and as much as corporations are gaining power, society feels increasingly resistant to a monolithic, corporate-run future. Right now, people are highly divided, and there’s a lot of pushback against corporate influence. Movements around ethical AI, environmental responsibility, and data privacy suggest that many of us want to slow down or redirect these trends. So while I think there’s a realistic foundation to these dystopian predictions, whether we actually end up in that kind of future will likely depend on how society addresses these issues—and I’m not convinced we’re all willing to “mesh” with a world of corporate control.

In the end, I think these sci-fi portrayals are hyperbolic critiques grounded in real concerns. They show what might happen if we don’t think critically about the role of corporations and technology in our lives, but they’re also a reminder of the power we have to steer our society away from those extremes.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In cyberpunk stories like Machinehood, we see how corporations gain power and control over people’s lives, especially through technology and resources. In Machinehood, the “pill funders” manage productivity-enhancing drugs that many people need to work in a highly competitive world. These corporations shape society by making people dependent on their products to survive, which mirrors how some companies influence our lives today.

For example, large tech companies like Amazon and Google have a significant impact on our daily routines, from the way we shop to the ads we see. They gather vast amounts of personal data, shaping what we see, hear, and even buy. Companies like Facebook have even been shown to influence political views by tailoring news feeds to certain audiences. Amazon’s control over its workers’ schedules and the conditions in their warehouses reflects how some corporations prioritize profit over people’s well-being.

Machinehood also highlights the dependence on performance enhancement, which is becoming more common in the real world. In gig economies, workers often rely on apps and metrics to keep up, similar to how people in Machinehood use productivity drugs. This is concerning, as it raises questions about whether society is pushing people to act like machines, losing personal choice and privacy along the way.

While Machinehood’s vision is extreme, it still warns us about the path we’re on. The story’s portrayal of corporations controlling every aspect of human life might be exaggerated, but it’s based on real-world trends that we can see today. This cautionary tale encourages us to think about the need for regulations and ethical standards, so that corporations don’t have unchecked power over individuals’ lives. While we may not reach the full dystopian world of Machinehood, it’s a reminder to be mindful of how much control we give to corporations.

Cavallaro, Dani. Cyberpunk and Cyberculture: Science Fiction and the Work of William Gibson. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000.

#BP05

Reading Time: 2 minutes

With human enhancement at its core, technology is changing at an incredible rate. Brain implants, genetic alterations, and bionic limbs—things that previously seemed like science fiction—are becoming a reality. These developments, in my opinion, will go beyond merely solving issues and instead open up new possibilities for humankind. The notion of becoming “more than human” is no longer an unrealistic fantasy; it is a decision we may all have to face.

https://www.dreamstime.com/illustration/breaking-limits.html

Imagine wearable neurotechnology that can assist you control your emotions, such as reducing anxiety or improving concentration when needed. It could impact how we handle stress, our mental well-being, and our level of productivity. Or consider having microscopic nanobots in your bloodstream that can identify diseases before they even manifest, extending your period of life. In addition to making life easier, these developments would increase resilience and adaptability. Improvements like these, which promote wellbeing and broaden our capabilities without changing who we are at our core, seem like opportunities worth pursuing in my opinion.

However, not all options are as desirable. Imagine a society in where companies sell pricey genetic enhancements to increase a person’s strength, speed, or intelligence. Would people who couldn’t afford it be left behind? And when we start altering who we are to meet some standard of perfection, what happens to diversity? I’m also concerned about the prospect of being too closely entwined with technology, such as substituting AI processors for a portion of our brains. At what point does it stop? 

What interests me the most about human enhancement is its ability to improve people’s lives while remaining true to themselves. The issue will be determining when to say yes—and when to say no. As these technologies become more widely available, I believe we will all be forced to consider what it means to be human. After all, just because something is possible does not automatically imply that it should be done.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/what-life-without-limits-dion-davis/?trk=portfolio_article-card_title

Reading Time: 3 minutes

What’s Next for Humanity?

As I reflect on what we’ve learned in this course, one question keeps surfacing: What will it mean to be human in a world where technology allows us to transcend our natural limits? Human augmentation—ranging from prosthetics and neural interfaces to genetic engineering—has evolved rapidly, and the next few decades promise even more groundbreaking developments. From curing diseases to enhancing cognitive abilities, the options for becoming “more than nature intended” seem limitless. But with these opportunities come tough questions about ethics, identity, and the essence of humanity.

What Could the Future Hold?

By the mid-21st century, we may see a world where human augmentation is as common as smartphones are today. Here are a few possibilities:

1. Neural Implants and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs):
   Companies like Neuralink are already making strides in creating BCIs that allow humans to communicate directly with machines. These implants could enhance memory, enable telepathic communication, or even provide instant access to vast amounts of information.
2. Genetic Modifications:
   Advances in CRISPR and gene therapy may allow us to edit our DNA to prevent hereditary diseases or enhance physical and cognitive traits. Imagine being able to boost your metabolism, improve your eyesight, or even increase your resistance to viruses.
3. Advanced Prosthetics and Exoskeletons:
   Prosthetics will continue to improve, providing not just replacements for lost limbs but enhancements that surpass natural human strength and dexterity. Exoskeletons could allow workers to lift heavy objects with ease or enable paraplegics to walk again.
4. Biological Augmentations:
   Innovations like bioengineered organs or synthetic skin could extend lifespans and improve quality of life, making once-fatal conditions manageable or curable.

What Would I Choose?

The allure of human augmentation is undeniable, but it’s essential to weigh the benefits and risks. Here are the adaptations I would consider and those I find unacceptable:

What I Would Try:

• Cognitive Enhancements:
  A neural implant that improves memory or speeds up learning would be life-changing. Imagine mastering a new language in days or retaining every piece of knowledge you’ve ever acquired. This feels like a natural extension of our thirst for knowledge.
• Medical Augmentations:
  If I faced a debilitating illness, I would embrace gene therapy or bioengineered organs without hesitation. These advancements align closely with the goals of traditional medicine—healing and preserving life.

What I Would Avoid:

• Cosmetic Augmentations:
  Enhancements aimed solely at aesthetic perfection seem unnecessary and potentially harmful. They could deepen societal pressures around beauty and contribute to new forms of inequality.
• Full Mind Uploads:
  The idea of transferring my consciousness to a digital form feels like a step too far. As Katherine Hayles discusses in How We Became Posthuman, separating the mind from the body could strip away what makes us human: our embodied experiences and emotions.

The Ethics of Augmentation

While these technologies hold incredible promise, they also raise serious ethical concerns. Will they be accessible to all, or will they exacerbate the gap between the wealthy and the poor? How do we ensure that human augmentation enhances society rather than dividing it? These are questions we must confront as these technologies become reality.

---

Final Thoughts

Human augmentation will likely define the next phase of our evolution, blurring the line between biology and technology. In my lifetime, I expect to see remarkable advancements that will improve lives, challenge societal norms, and redefine what it means to be human. However, we must proceed thoughtfully, ensuring that these changes respect our shared humanity.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Human augmentation is advancing fast, and I think it will become a big part of everyday life during my lifetime and long after. With developments in bioengineering, neural interfaces, and genetic editing, it’s easy to imagine a future where we can enhance our physical and mental abilities in ways that once seemed impossible. From devices that monitor our health to brain-computer interfaces that could improve memory or let us control technology with our minds, the line between natural and engineered might get very blurry.

There will probably be a lot of options for enhancing ourselves. Augmented reality contact lenses or neural implants could help us process information faster. Gene editing might eliminate genetic diseases or even improve traits like intelligence or physical strength. Exoskeletons could help people with disabilities or make physically demanding work easier. These advancements could give us more control over our bodies and abilities than ever before.

I’d be open to some augmentations, especially ones that improve quality of life. Things like better vision because I do not have 20/20 vision like I used to, real-time health monitoring, or tools to help with focus and memory sound great. I’d also consider neural interfaces if they could help with learning or managing tasks. But I’d be against any changes that could take away my autonomy or sense of self. For example, I wouldn’t trust augmentations that allow companies to monitor or control the tech in my body because I am already skeptical of some AI and companies having acess to my data and such but I would be uncomfortable with enhancements that create unfair divides between people who can afford them and those who can’t.

Human augmentation has a lot of potential to make life better, but it also raises some serious ethical questions. As these technologies become more common, we’ll need to find a balance between innovation and fairness, making sure they improve our lives without undermining what makes us human.

#BP06

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Based on how technology is altering in my lifetime currently I feel as though in the future time to come human augmentation has grown drastically. I do believe that the world or the US for example would still operate with a government but these companies will become a part of the government and gain control of the free will individuals currently have. I feel as though free will will become less and less as time goes on. Also, technology or Ai would take the place of more and more jobs solely done by humans while our physical world would turn completely digital, for example strictly online shopping. Many of the ways I feel the world would alter and change in my lifetime was presented in the movie I used for our recent research assignment. In code 46 one thing I noticed humans having to do other than give up a percentage of their free will to the government was using a device implemented into their bodies to travel from place to place. In the movie the government watches how, where and when all individuals travel to and they can be permitted not to travel anywhere if the government chooses not to. Another very strong reason I believe things as such would be implemented into the technology of my future is because of current politics. Currently according to politics in the news a lot of the things mentioned in the post and un class have been neutered or planned to occur in the near future.All new adaptations known to come to the future of technology I would be willing to give a try at least. Based on trying it I would then determine if I would incorporate such technology into my life. An adaptation I would refuse to try is anything which has too much control over my life or mind/body altering. Things made to make my life simpler such as ai or chat gpt i would have not issue using or even incorporating into my life.