Reading Time: 2 minutes

The portrayal of corporations in sci-fi media compels us to rethink the ways in which we imagine corporate power. Novels like Neuromancer and movies like Blade Runner examine futures in which these sinister corporations have an almost dystopian level of control over both the citizens and technology. With this media analysis, it seems only appropriate to ask if this is something we should be worried about. Are we heading in this direction? Is this representation realistic, or simply an exaggerated criticism?

Corporate Dominance in Neuromancer & Blade Runner

“Neuromancer” by William Gibson describes a dystopian vision of corporate control. Set in a dystopian world run by these amoral corporations and technology used to serve them. Our protagonist, Case, is forced to serve as a chess piece in these corporate schemes. Gibson employs this character to explore the consequences of giving corporations total control over technology and morals. This strategy is reflective of the trepidation we have in modern day about big business, specifically regarding technology. In largely unregulated arenas like artificial intelligence and genetic modification, decisions made by corporations may well have disastrous societal consequences.

Similarly, in “Blade Runner” the Tyrell Corporation is the very embodiment of corporate dominance. In this society, they are not only building impressive AI and replicants, they have also infiltrated every aspect of society. This dystopian world emphasizes the dangers of unchecked corporate power, which puts the autonomy of citizens in jeopardy. Dr. Eldon Tyrell is the archetype of corporate ambition at any cost, ethics be damned, living in a world where artificial beings have constant questions about their existence. The dominance of Tyrell suggests a vaguely dystopian future in which technological progress trumps ethical imperatives. And this theme reverberates in our world, where companies like Meta and Google decide how we interact with ourselves, receive information, and move through life.

Hyperbole or Cautionary Tale?

Sounding in many ways absurd, both Blade Runner and Neuromancer show us their own corporate worlds as a kind of warning. These two stories underscore the dangers of unrestrained corporate power and need for ethical guidelines and government oversight. Elite corporate power — the kind of human baggage carried by mega-companies such as Tyrell or those in Gibson’s world — is slightly outrageous, sure, but it encourages us to get up a bit on our high horses and contemplate how Big Corporate had us scurrying about today and why we may need systems that preserve individual freedom and contribute to the public good.

In conclusion, even if Blade Runner and Neuromancer give hyperbolic, nightmarish visions of corporate dominance, they are playing to real fears about the contemporary business world. These are not merely critiques; they represent calls to action, exposing some of the more important ethical limits that should be imposed on technology and corporate power, along with by implication warning us about the need for government protective measures defending the public interest.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

SInce the timing of this post coincides with the release of Arcane Season 2, I thought it would be appropriate to show the dichotomy of Zaun and Piltover. Although set in a steampunk era, the themes and ideas of Arcane can resonate with every audience and it can especially be tied with Cyberpunk. As a brief summary, the picture on top in the underground city of Zaun. Zaun has a funky green haze to its atmosphere due to all the toxic chemicals the above Piltover wastes. The people of Zaun are dying if chemical poisoning, shimmer (a drug) addiction, starvation, poverty, and gang violence. Piltover on the other hand it a white and gold empire that prides itself on its innovation as the nation of progress. Piltover has the best innovations in science, health, and weaponry while also lookinf down on Zaun for its “animal-like” behaviors. The two cities have never seen eye to eye and the innocent are always the ones who bear the cost of war.

The reason why I brought up Arcane is the first place is that its technology and ground-breaking ideas come from hard working and innocent scientists at the start of the story. The science studies are kept under strict rules to keep the people safe, but during times of high stress the counsel of authority can overturn these rules. Arcane proves that progress itself is not evil. There will always be powerful figures and leaders who want to abuse such powers and progress, but can only do so when the is public distress.

If we take a look at Neuromancer, we see that edgerunners and civilians all live in the slums of the city similar to the conditions in Zaun. The elite and the rich, on the other hand, are able to live in comfort and with good health/ safety in both Piltover and the Towers. I think that corporate greed and political greed in both Arcane and Neuromancer are very similar as they both choose to exploit the working minds of genius scientists for the sake of progress. I do not think that corporations have the best interest at heart since many large businesses only care about money and not their consumers. It seems very cynical to say, but I think that many corporations willingly put out low quality goods into the market because they know that they can get away with it. It’s a world where everyone wants the newest model of any item they can get their hands on, so companies no they can skimp on quality.

The example I choose to focus on is the Tesla Cybertruck, which just a few weeks ago had its first recorded accident with another vehicle. The driver in the regular vehicle had no fatal injuries, but his car was severely squishes from the head on collision. The cyber truck, on the other hand, was not deformed in the slightest; but the driver had severe internal damages. I wanted to talk about this case because cars were made to be compressed on collision in order to decrease the energy that the driver will receive. In other words, cars are meant to die to save our lives. I find it interesting how the Cybertruck is built in order to withstand damages at the cost of its owner’s safety. But maybe I am reading too much into things. I also wanted to pick this topic since it would be much quicker than if I made my discussion about Big Pharma.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Are Corporations Becoming the Next Tyrell Corporation? Blade Runner’s Dystopian Vision in Today’s World

What if the chilling, dystopian world of Blade Runner wasn’t just science fiction but a glimpse into our future? In Ridley Scott’s 1982 classic, the Tyrell Corporation controls the creation of “replicants”—artificial beings that look and think like humans but lack human rights or autonomy. As Tyrell blurs the lines between humans and machines, it brings up questions that feel incredibly relevant today. Are we hurtling towards a future where corporations hold this kind of power? Given the explosive growth in AI, gene editing, and data control by big companies, are we on a path toward becoming the next Tyrell Corporation, or is this simply an exaggerated, cautionary tale?

The Tyrell Effect: Modern Parallels in Today’s Corporations

In Blade Runner, the Tyrell Corporation embodies extreme corporate power and technology, not just by leading innovation but by creating and controlling life itself. This dark vision of a corporation wielding massive influence over human lives and identities isn’t far from today’s reality, especially in industries like AI, biotech, and pharmaceuticals, where giants like Google, Amazon, and Meta are transforming our daily lives and, in some ways, our very nature.

Google, for example, started as a search engine but has since moved into AI, bioengineering, and even autonomous driving. Its subsidiary, DeepMind, recently made breakthroughs in predicting protein structures, which could revolutionize drug discovery and genetic engineering. But while this development is groundbreaking, it also raises big ethical questions. Who should control such powerful tech? How will it be used? These questions eerily echo Tyrell’s role in creating and dominating replicants.

And let’s not forget gene-editing pioneers like CRISPR Therapeutics and Editas Medicine, which are working on technology to alter DNA itself—potentially eradicating genetic diseases or even enhancing human traits. Though these companies aren’t yet creating “replicants,” their advancements could make such capabilities a future possibility. What if corporations start holding the keys to genetic modification, setting us on a path where corporate decisions dictate who gets to live healthier or even superior lives?

Are Corporations Already Shaping Humanity?

Corporations’ impact today might not be as extreme as creating replicants, but their influence over human lives and decisions is undeniable. Take social media companies like Meta (formerly Facebook), which shape public opinion, affect mental health, and influence politics. Blade Runner portrays Tyrell’s replicants as tools created to serve corporate interests, discarded when they’re no longer useful. Some critics argue that tech giants treat user data in a similar way—valuing it primarily as a product to maximize profits, often without considering the social and psychological impacts on users.

This focus on profit can push corporations to prioritize revenue over ethics, leading to outcomes that feel dystopian. Amazon, for instance, has been criticized for its warehouse practices, where workers are tracked and managed by AI to push them to maximum productivity. This approach, which some say reduces workers to little more than cogs in a machine, feels uncomfortably similar to the lack of autonomy that Tyrell’s replicants experience.

Are We Really Heading Toward a “Tyrell” Future?

While modern corporations do share certain qualities with Tyrell, it might be an exaggeration to say we’re inevitably headed toward a Blade Runner-like dystopia. Regulatory bodies, ethical boards, and a growing public awareness often help keep corporate power in check. Today’s technological advancements are frequently scrutinized by society and governments, who actively debate the ethics of AI, data privacy, and genetic modification.

Unlike Tyrell, modern corporations face accountability measures thanks to privacy rights movements, data protection laws like GDPR, and new AI ethics initiatives. Public pressure has even led some tech giants to adopt “AI for good” frameworks and to establish ethics boards. This evolving awareness and demand for corporate responsibility mean that, while we’re moving quickly with technology, we’re not entirely unprotected from the risks it brings.

Tyrell’s Lesson for Today

The Tyrell Corporation in Blade Runner serves as a powerful warning about the dangers of unchecked technological power and corporate greed. While parts of today’s corporate landscape do mirror aspects of this dystopia, Blade Runner should remind us of the stakes, not predict our fate. Whether technology uplifts humanity or drives us toward dystopia ultimately depends on the choices we make corporations, regulators, and consumers alike.

In the end, becoming a modern-day Tyrell isn’t inevitable, but vigilance is crucial. With responsible innovation, strong regulation, and a commitment to ethical standards, we can leverage the benefits of technology while avoiding a dystopian spiral. Blade Runner may be fiction, but it offers a clear, cautionary insight into what our future could look like if we fail to take these responsibilities seriously.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In the world of cyberpunk narratives, corporations often appear as unstoppable forces, prioritizing profit at humanity’s expense. From the omnipotent Tyrell Corporation in Blade Runner to the shadowy Tessier-Ashpools in Neuromancer, and the exploitative “pill funders” in Machinehood, these stories caution us about the unchecked power of corporate greed. But is this dystopian future plausible, or are these tales hyperbolic warnings meant to provoke deeper thought?

Take the Tyrell Corporation—more than just a business, it embodies the power to create life, manufacturing replicants that blur the line between human and machine. This depiction warns of the dangers when profit-driven ambitions override ethical boundaries for technological advancement. Similarly, the Tessier-Ashpools in Neuromancer are an insulated, ultra-wealthy family that controls advanced AI, highlighting the dangerous disconnect between powerful elites and societal needs.

In Machinehood, the “pill funders” epitomize corporate exploitation by controlling the very substances people need to survive and adapt in a hyper-tech world. These narratives share a common theme: when corporations prioritize profit over people, societal stability crumbles, with technology benefiting a select few while the majority struggle.

While these stories may seem exaggerated, they resonate with real-world trends. Consider tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta. These companies wield unprecedented influence—not just in the marketplace but also in shaping public policy, public behavior, and global communication. Amazon’s near-monopoly in e-commerce and logistics underscores how one corporation’s reach can impact millions of jobs and consumer choices. Google’s dominance over information dissemination raises significant questions about data privacy and the concentration of knowledge.

The pharmaceutical industry’s actions during global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, also mirror the “pill funders” in Machinehood. High prices, patent protections, and profit-centric strategies restricted access to life-saving treatments, echoing the cyberpunk fear that corporate greed can outstrip human welfare.

Is this path toward corporate dominance an inevitability? While it’s easy to dismiss cyberpunk stories as extreme, reality is not far removed. The concentration of corporate power and the speed of technological advancement suggest that these narratives might be more prophetic than we’d like to believe.

However, this outcome isn’t set in stone. Regulatory oversight, public advocacy, and responsible innovation can act as checks to ensure that technological progress benefits society as a whole. Without proactive measures to prioritize human well-being over profit, we risk inching closer to the futures depicted in these cautionary tales.

Overall, Cyberpunk fiction serves as a timely reminder of the potential pitfalls of corporate overreach. While stories like Blade Runner, Neuromancer, and Machinehood may exaggerate aspects for dramatic effect, they contain grains of truth that reflect our present-day challenges. The direction we choose now—whether to accept the current trajectory or push for a fairer balance between profit and public interest—will shape our future.

For those interested in exploring these parallels further, analyses of tech monopolies, AI ethics, and automation’s impact on labor are essential starting points. Documentaries and discussions on corporate influence and AI ethics can also enrich our understanding.

Let’s continue this conversation: Are we headed toward a world where corporate control goes unchecked, or will society push back and redefine what progress means?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Hybridization technology would be an amazing way to advance human society in a transhumanist way. Animals have many valuable characteristics that would be able to help  humanity achieve things we could only dream of before. We would be able to soar high in the sky, explore the deep sea, or run at amazing speeds. If we had the technology to transfer characteristics from one animal to me, the animal I would choose would be a dolphin. A dolphin is one of the most intelligent mammals. They currently exhibit skills and social structures similar to what we see in people and primates. Dolphins have a great memory and are able to adapt based on given circumstances. With being a dolphin hybrid, I would be able to dive to amazing depths of the ocean and see so many things that we as man probably don’t know exist. 70% of the Earth’s ocean is unexplored, being a hybrid I would be able to explore deep reveens, abandoned ships, and unexplored caves. Being able to swim at 37 mph and play with other sea animals would be amazing. Using their echolocation I would be able to navigate around anything and anywhere. Although I want the abilities of the dolphin I wouldn’t want to look like one. I would still want my human features. With being a hybrid I would have to be mindful of others and their outlook of hybridization. Therefore, having my human characteristics and humanity intact would help minimize potential conflict. I personally wouldn’t want to give up my humanity in order to be a hybrid. I would want the hybridization to add to my capabilities not take away from it.This would occur through combining the most valuable aspects of both dolphin and human characteristics.  I believe that a dolphin’s behaviors and interactions would mimic very similar to humans. 

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Let’s talk about cyberpunk, those gritty, neon-drenched worlds full of mega-corporations controlling every aspect of life. We see it in Blade Runner, with the Tyrell Corporation engineering artificial humans for profit, or in Neuromancer, where the Tessier-Ashpools build their legacy on secrets and untouchable wealth. These companies have power beyond government control, leaving the average person almost powerless. It’s fascinating, but could any of this actually happen in real life?

Now, take a look at today’s world. Tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Meta shape the way we communicate, shop, and even think. Their algorithms track our habits, curate our feeds, and sometimes even predict our moves. Add in Big Pharma’s influence over what medicines hit the market and their control over drug prices—this all sounds like it’s ripped straight from a cyberpunk plot. But is it?

While it might feel like a stretch, this influence raises some big questions about where these companies are headed. Sure, these corporations aren’t building robots to serve humanity yet, but their growing impact on our lives could be a stepping stone in that direction.

Is the cyberpunk genre just a hyperbolic take on capitalism, or is it actually onto something? Maybe both. These stories push boundaries to make us think: What happens if we let corporations grow too powerful? We have regulations to keep things in check, but technology is evolving faster than laws can keep up. Could we one day see a world where companies hold as much power as governments? The cyberpunk answer is “yes.”

Cyberpunk tales like Blade Runner and Neuromancer make us question where society is going. Are we okay with companies having access to so much of our personal data? Should we be thinking about new limits as technology and corporate influence grow? These questions don’t have easy answers, but maybe that’s the point: we’re supposed to stay curious and cautious. What do you think? Do you see any of these corporate trends as concerning, or are these just cool sci-fi stories with no real threat?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

In today’s world, it’s nearly impossible to escape advertising. Whether scrolling through social media, watching TV, walking down the street, or even checking your email, ads are everywhere, urging you to buy something. But behind this constant barrage of marketing is a clear goal: corporations want to make a profit—and they’ll do almost anything to get us to open our wallets, even if it means downplaying or ignoring the dangers their products may cause to consumers and the people they employ. Consumers ingest products like cigarettes to help them with anxiety and then get addicted, the long-term effect of smoking tobacco/cigarettes leads to cancer and other serious problems all at the cost of making someone else rich off the suffering of others. Corporate greed impacts the ones employed by the corporations putting them in unsafe work conditions that don’t afford the workers to live comfortably.
Additionally, kids being employed is detrimental because it brings the human development index down. After all, the kids are working instead of receiving an adequate education that can help them be better in life instead of having to work in these industries that always result in a zero-sum game, in which no one benefits. Therefore, I do think corporations are headed in the direction of the cyberpunk approach. Due to corporations not caring about the welfare of the people they create value in their products and help them earn profit. The patterns of corporate greed and disregard for human value resemble the dystopian realities of cyberpunk fiction more and more. I think the movies/ creative expression of cyberpunk which model the future of our society and display corporate greed is a realistic prediction of how we should expect our society to operate. Change is inevitable so it is likely that ads will progress and corporations will only get greedier to manipulate individuals into throwing their morals away and purchasing products just to do it because they have been manipulated.