I think human augmentation will evolve to the point where we will have biotechnological body parts. If someone’s arm is amputated, then doctors and/or engineers can help/work together to give the patient a robotic arm. I believe technology will be very beneficial to society and will 100% make a large impact on the health industry. However, I also see a downside pertaining to the future of human augmentation in my lifetime. For example, Elon Musk and his team have already created a brain chip to implant in patients’ lives that allow them to control computers just by thinking. This can create many privacy issues when it comes to corporations owning basically a piece of our body. I think options will be very diverse in the future because, as time passes, human beautification rises. Meaning more and more people will want surgery to make themselves fit the standard at the moment. Iâm not sure what specifically the options would be, but I know for sure that companies would take advantage of people’s insecurities and use that as monetization. For instance, we might see products marketed to make individuals feel “perfect” or “enhanced,” leading to a societal shift in what is considered normal or acceptable. This could create an environment where people feel pressured to conform to unrealistic standards, making it harder to embrace individuality. I would not be willing to try any adaptations that involve deviating from nature. All adaptations are unacceptable for me because I do not want to modify my body. However, for other people, they can do anything they want with their body because thatâs their life; so that wouldn’t be unacceptable to me. Ultimately, while I see the potential benefits of human augmentation, I also think we must be cautious about the ethical and societal implications it brings.
It’s Part of the Business
I think that corporations may be heading in that direction but not to the extent that was shown in Blade Runner. I think companies will start invading consumerâs privacy even more than they do now. With the way technology is advancing, companies are already tracking more about us than we realize. They collect our data from every click, search, and purchase we make, using it to build profiles on us to figure out how to sell us more things. As technology continues to evolve, I believe they will push these boundaries even further, finding new ways to monitor what we do and use that information to their advantage. I also believe that they will start taking advantage of people and their finances because they know they can monopolize their efforts. Some companies are already making it harder for consumers to shop around or break free from their services. They create ecosystems that make it difficult for people to stop using their products once theyâve bought into them. By owning the devices we use, the apps we rely on, and even the ways we pay for things, these companies gain more control over our choices. They know that once we become dependent on their products, weâre less likely to look for alternatives, even if they raise prices or make things harder for us. The corporation in the movie Blade Runner uses human identity as a way to commodify peopleâs inner insecurities. They create replicants, beings designed to serve humans, but with short lifespans, making them more easily controlled. This idea isnât too far off from how companies today use our fears and insecurities to sell us things. Whether itâs ads telling us we need to look or feel a certain way, or products that promise to solve all our problems, companies are already tapping into these emotional triggers to make money. Itâs a dangerous path, and if profit continues to be the only focus, companies will keep pushing the limits of how much they can control.
Dolphuman: The Hybridization
I would want to be hybridized with a dolphin because they are extremely intelligent and they can communicate using echolocation. I think that being smart in this world is important and can take you further than almost anything else in this world which is partially why I would choose to be hybridized with a dolphin. Secondly, I would want the quality of being able to use echolocation because that means I would be able to communicate with confidentiality. Something else that is cool that comes with being hybridized with a dolphin is that they can breathe underwater. That attribute would be such an experience to have because humans canât naturally survive underwater for long periods of time. If this attribute is not mutually exclusive from gills then I would actually like to just miss out on getting to have the chance to breathe underwater because I would not want to give up the way my body looks for something unnatural like that. They are also genuinely sweet animals who will turn dangerous if need be to protect their own. I feel like I have some similarities with their characteristics which sums up why I would choose a dolphin. However, I wouldnât want the physical attributes that come with hybridization. I definitely wouldnât be willing to give up the way I look for hybridization. On the other hand, I would definitely give up my human intelligence for hybridization. Overall, I wouldnât want to be hybridized at all because I would lose my pure humanity. There are things that come with that form of biotechnology and Iâm confident that I donât want to be that person to figure out what those things are. The changes and side effects are unpredictable so I wouldnât want to risk my life for that. Humanity is better left untouched and unmodified; the natural, biological way.
Do You Like our Owl?
Both works, Blade Runner (1982) and Neuromancer (1984), depict sprawling, dystopian cities characterized by neon lights, towering skyscrapers, and a blend of high-tech and low-life elements. We see in Blade Runner (1982) the muggy, gloomy city thatâs lit up by the artificial sporadic lighting from buildings and/or vehicles. The movie is set in 2019 in the city of Los Angeles where society has turned dystopian. There are synthetic humans, better known as replicants who question the morals of humans and the definition of humanity. Everywhere you look there are towering skyscrapers that reign over the city below. Rain is a prominent type of weather here with heavy clouds and thick pollution that reinforces the dull lighting within the movie. The less fortunate people are stuck at the bottom dwelling in the compacted streets below while people in power are flourishing above. Whereas in Neuromancer (1984) the setting takes place in Chiba City, Japan. It is assumed that this book reflects a highly advanced, but decayed world during the 21st century. Neuromancer begins to describe the city as dirty, dense, and grimy. Similarly to Blade Runner (1982), there are numerous towering buildings above, but down below are impoverished communities struggling to make ends meet legally. People have turned to crime for survival but in turn makes the setting even more disastrous. Both of these works show us that even with fancy flashing lights, the city overall has not improved one bit for the general public. This adds into the illusion of a more technologically advanced society. The setting shows the power dynamic between the higher up and the rest of the population. While there is crime, corruption, and poverty it is also true that there is technology, money, and beautiful artificial landscapes. Both works can be seen as seminal examples of cyberpunk; just as the movie Blade Runner (1982) had heavy influence on the novel Neuromancer (1984).
A Post-Gender world
Haraway offers a vision of a post-gender world in which identity is fluid. This vision can be seen within Janelle MonĂĄeâs album âDirty Computerâ which depicts a dystopian world where non-conforming individuals are persecuted. Firstly, in the âCyborg Manifestoâ essay she informs the reader that there are many binaries within western culture. For example, like the concept of male and female; itâs either one or the other, not both and not definitely not neither. This social structure creates the means for power dynamics within society. With power dynamics comes inequality, social isolation, and gender supremacy. When addressing cyborg entities she expresses the fact that they cannot be categorized within these bounds. A cyborg is a hybrid entity which is fluid and does not represent a binary gender. Some of these ideas can be seen in Janelle MonĂĄeâs album. My favorite song on her album, âI Like Thatâ, tries to break down societal norms affecting women. Women are supposed to exude beauty and have this specific sort of feminine identity/presence. She says, âI donât care what I look like, but I feel goodâ. She realizes that as a lady she is looked at and judged on a daily basis because of her gender. However she doesnât care about what others have to say. She believes that feeling good about yourself comes from within, not from the outside. As long as you feel good inside then that is all that matters. Another example from that song is âAnd I like that, I donât really give a f*ck if I was just the only one / Who likes thatâ. Janelle is saying she doesnât want to conform to the social norms within her society. This lyric may not clearly state gender but it expresses her fluid identity and individuality. Both Haraway and Janelle MonĂĄe come to the same conclusion on their view of a post-gender world where identity is fluid and somewhat nonbinary.
Blurred Ethical Lines
Many established boundaries have begun to switch when it comes to the subgenre cyberpunk. In particular, the ethical lines have been blurred when it comes to the enhanced technology that is invading our lives, especially our private and personal lives. Recently women have found out that some of the apps on our phone are receiving data from our inputs and then in some circumstances selling our information. These apps unfortunately are the center of attention for a whole entire week during the month and sometimes even more frequently. Most women have probably already come to the conclusion that these applications that I am talking about are period tracking apps. For those seven days during the month, sometimes less or more, women enter their personal data into these systems and algorithms that are built to gather and contain sensitive information. Everybody is already privy to the fact that the terms and guidelines that we are forced to sign when downloading and running apps are extremely hefty and long. Within these numerous pages of legal jargon it explains how the information that is inputted can and will be sold for analytics and/or profit. This then intertwines with the overturning of roe v wade which may be new information for some. Abortion is now illegal in many states and restricted for some. This means that if a woman needs an abortion for personal reasons or because of an emergency they are out of luck and might have to travel state lines to receive proper care. By looking at specific statistics within these aforementioned apps it is clear that there is a bigger picture being painted. Their system will allow employees and companies to see who has had an abortion, and if warranted then they could probably find out in what state the user lives. If the state happens to be pro-life then the user could get punished harshly for such actions. These apps are disguised as harmless, but in reality the minute act of entering oneâs period flow can lead to serious and life-altering jail time. Technology continues to invade our personal lives and lines will forever be blurred if boundaries are not set in place to protect us and our privacy.