Janelle Monae’s songs in the album explore many of Haraway’s ideas from Cyborg Manifesto. One topic that connects with Haraway’s essay is cyborg as a metaphor. Monae also uses her character, an android, Cindi Mayweather as a metaphor. These two think similarly by using cyborgs and characters to represent the boundaries of human and machine-changing human identity. ArchAndroid critiques societal structures of race, gender, and identity, challenging the structures by advocating for more inclusivity. Haraway has the idea from Cyborg Manifesto critiquing traditional feminism encouraging the pluralistic view of gender and identity creating a difference in society. This relates to Monae’s album because she explores intersectionality highlighting various identities and how the factors contribute to being viewed as an other. When it comes to Haraway’s idea of blurring of boundaries the difference I see there is Donna mentions 3 key boundaries human and animal, organism and machine, physical and non-physical, while Janelle mentions the character of human and machine. A question to think about is how can Janelle introduce the two other key boundaries in her narrative of her albums. Social and Political commentary from ArchAndroid represents racism and gender oppression expanding that technology is a tool of corporate control, but racial power structure, while on the other hand, Haraway’s essay mentions the disruption of power structures because of new identities that constraints the traditional political categories. Lastly, I wanted to cover how Monae expressed throughout her album the duality of technology with oppression and liberation. She does this by combining liberation and oppression with her character, Cindi Mayweather breaking free from societal chains, but using technology to support marginalized voices. Donna Haraway expresses how technology is beneficial for liberation and oppression because of the improvement of technology creating new identities and narratives to overturn traditional power structures.
Blade Runner and Neuromancer display big corporations that are powerful enough to control advanced technology that result in individuals losing their identity and freedom. Blade Runner and Neuromancer highlight between technological progress and its effects on individuals. In addition, they both show how much control people have over the face of powerful corporations and technological dominance. In Blade Runner, corporations created advanced techs known as replicants that are identical to humans but denied basic rights. It narrates the issues of identity, ethical boundaries, and the nature of humanity. The key themes presented throughout Blade Runner are the impacts of advanced artificial intelligence on society and the loss of identity. Neuromancer is similar to Blade Runner in that it has advanced technology that modifies characters while trapped in a highly corrupted world by corporate power. The key theme for Neuromancer is corporate control dominating society by taking away their freedom and personal identity. The Relation Between High Technology, Human Identity, the Body, and the Dystopian Future Society of Neuromancers emphasizes how Case was already stripped of his identity when jacking into cyberspace. He started having withdraws when he couldn’t jack into cyberspace which shows the effects of the relationship between technology and his identity. In Technodystopia: Are we heading towards a real-world Blade Runner? It expresses ethical implications on what it means to be human. For example, Rick connects with Rachel and Roy, who question his morals as if replicants can hae feelings and basic rights just like humans. The distinction I learned between the two is in Neuromancer, Case depends on technology that presents a loss of individuality, while on the other hand, Rick deals with the wonder if replicants can have humanity. Both articles demonstrate corporate power control over advanced technology affects personal identity and freedom. Blade Runner and Neuromancer bring attention to the lines between humans and machines and question what it means to be human in a society where technology can modify our traits as a human.
References
Kashani, B., & Kashani, N. (n.d.). English Studies -School of Arts and Communication Bachelor’s Degree 15 hp Spring 2022 Supervisor: Berndt Clavier. https://mau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1727457/FULLTEXT02.pdf
Paterson, A., & Bush, G. (2022, February 21). Technodystopia: Are we heading towards a real-world Blade Runner?Unimelb.edu.au; The University of Melbourne. https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/technodystopia-are-we-heading-towards-a-real-world-blade-runner#:~:text=First%20and%20foremost%2C%20this%20sci
What has changed is the music industry. The shifting boundary started in the late 20th century, more or so recently. I’ve learned about AI’s influence through TikTok, where AI-generated music is becoming increasingly common, how it can produce music and much more. For example, when artists can’t think of how to start music or content for their music, there is an app or tool called BandLab that is AI-generated to help with songs. It creates possibilities for artists to experiment with new sounds and styles without needing as much technical knowledge. In addition, it provides inspiration to artists to start a new project, offering a foundation upon which they can build. AI can now produce originals, break compositions for remixing, and even help tailor playlists to match specific moods or vibes. It enhances the listening experience by introducing songs that align with individual tastes and emotional states, making music discovery more engaging and efficient. My thoughts on AI with music can be a little weird because recently, there was a situation between two artists, and everyone thought the artist made a new song when AI used the artist’s voice to create a new song which freaked me out a little. I say that because it blurs the line between authentic and artificial music. The ability to replicate voices through the lines between real and AI-generated content raises concerns about copyrights and the rights of artists. Despite these concerns, I can see how AI could be valuable for musicians and creators. While I’m not an artist or songwriter myself, AI’s involvement could help streamline the creative process and make music production more accessible for many. As years go on moving forward will be finding a balance between embracing AI’s innovative potential and protecting the integrity and rights of artists in the process.