Skip to content

Cyberpunk, the Postglobal and the Posthuman

A website by the students in Dr. Todd's XCOR 3020 class at Xavier University of Louisiana

  • Start
  • Syllabus
    • Syllabus: Class Needs
    • Syllabus: Learning Activities
    • Syllabus: Learning Environment
    • Syllabus: Instructor Expectations
    • Syllabus: Tips for Success
    • Syllabus: Semester Schedule
  • Blog
    • Our Authors
  • Podcast
    • Season One
    • Season Two
    • Season Three
  • Research
    • Research: Cyberpunk Media
    • Research: Enhancement Technologies

Author: Aryaam H.

The path to what is not human

09 December 2024 Aryaam H.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

As we have already seen, human augmentation has, so far, been mostly used as a positive. It has focused on allowing people who have disabilities to have the same processes as those without one. For instance, cochlear implants have helped many hear better. It is important to note that these augmentations do not make them “superhuman”, which means they do not go “beyond” what it means to be human. This is mostly to do with the unethical nature that these experimentations must have, as well as the need to define what would make a human “better”. In the particular instance of eugenics, this has been widely discussed.

"Ultrasound 7 weeks & 4 days" by jessica.diamond is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.
“Ultrasound 7 weeks & 4 days” by jessica.diamond is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

When babies are born with certain disabilities, it does not take away from their autonomy as a human being. However, in society, as we’ve seen with MAID policies in Canada, they are often denied good care or help from society until medically-assisted death seems like the only option. When one comes up with the idea to genetically modify sperm in order to create a “favorable” human being, all it will do is continually cause inequality in reality. What is favorable? Is it based on height? Looks? Race? Who will get access to these facilities? Unfortunately, as time passes, it seems that eugenics is becoming a possibility in many people’s minds. That, in my eyes, is completely unacceptable.

People might then argue, isn’t changing your body to add tails or horn also disfiguration? In my eyes, if it does not give you an extreme physical upperhand, then I do not care. What is the difference between that and getting insane piercings and cutting your tongue. People dislike it because it goes against what they view as a “socially acceptable human” but I only care about if something goes against a biological view of what it means to be human. There is no need for prosthetics that go beyond human capabilities in my eyes, and we cannot bite the hand that feeds us. If we begin to explore what it means to distance ourselves from being human by these techniques, then we can turn to the vast amount of media that proves this to be a terrible idea. Society is not equipped for another factor that could aid in inequality or discrimination

Dirty Computer and the virus that differentiates us

09 December 2024 Aryaam H.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

In Janelle Monae’s 2018 album, Dirty Computer, Janelle positions computers as analogous to humans, highlighting the rigid nature of both. Both this album and Haraway’s concepts, challenge traditional gender, sexuality, and race roles within human beings using the “human v machine” debate as a closer look into this. Janelle mainly uses the term “dirty computers” to describe a computer that has a bug or virus in it. Translating this to humans, this would mean any human that does fit the societal mold of what it means to be perfect. And perfect for Janelle is a white straight man. Haraway deems the cyborg as something similar: the rejection of what it means to be a perfect human. There are binary constraints that a cyborg cannot adhere to, and similarly, neither do humans who were born “different”. In this case, the narrative of it being  “bug” is a positive to Janelle and she does not shy away from celebrating her differences. To Haraway, the only way to liberate hybridity is to reject the societal notions and constraints that lead to this. 

“Janelle Monae Age Of PleasureTour 2023” by Casira Copes is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

In the beginning of “Crazy, Classic, Life” Janelle offers her rendition of the declaration of  independence by declaring “That all men and women are created equal”. This particular lyrics then challenges and confronts the lack of female inclusion without society, culture, and politics in documents that have become the backbone of America. If America will not include her, then Janelle would force it to. It is this unabashed opinion that mirrors the exact critique Haraway has on the power behind the patriarchal structures in our society. Janelle also unwinds the intersectionality between her race and gender by comparing her stress as a black woman to the stress her afro undergoes when it is forced to be “pressed”. Hairstyles in the African American community is ranked favorably paced in its vicinity to white hairstyles. Women who often walk out in their natural hair are seen as messy and unkempt. Haraway similarly rejects this one-sided privilege whether it be gender or race that is being exhibited. In “Django Jane”, Janelle attempts to “take back the narrative” from white men. Using the metaphor of a computer, she opts to rewrite her own future and identity.

The Growing Disregard for Ethics

27 November 2024 Aryaam H.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Tyrell Corporations: “More Human than Human”

In The Blade Runner The Tyrell Corporation is at the forefront of multiple issues. Tyrell Corporations is a Los Angeles based conglomerate that focuses on the biotech sector of technology. They spend the majority of their time working on an enhanced form of humans named replicants. However, these weren’t human and instead were androids designed to look indistinguishable from humans and from organic substances. The company’s slogan, “More human than human” derived from this. The replicants looked human but were far more capable of things than regular humans. The only difference, in the company’s eyes, was their lack of empathy and human emotions.

Nevertheless, as profit rose, so did ethical concerns. The company disregarded the safety of citizens and genetic enhancement and continued to create more advanced versions. Despite advancing their emotions and lifespans, as well as their slogan, the corporation did not regard these replicants anything close to humans. These replicants were regarded as obedient and subservient in order to complete both on and off land labor without any workplace ethical sanctions placed (as they were technically not human). This downregulation of slavery on enhanced “humans” is therefore a largely ethical concern, and one that the real world may be heading towards soon.

America, Corporations, and the Uncomfortable Quest for Dominance

“OpenAI logo with magnifying glass (52916339167)” by Jernej Furman from Slovenia is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

The world seems to be trending towards the one in The Blade Runner and there are some similarities between Tyrell Corporation’s practices and the ones in American companies. The mistreatment of replicants mirrors amazon and its mistreatment of workers. Amazon has made the news constantly for ethical concerns and its growing monopoly over online shopping. Online, Google and OpenAI are companies that have embraced the use of AI with open arms, disregarding the environmental concerns that come with it. Their relentless need to grow and expand the sector of AI is pushing the creation of their own AI with “human-like capabilities”

Tyrell Corporations focused heavily on biotech, and similar sentiments can be seen in companies today, who may also be based in America. In the 2000s began a sharp rise in genetic boxes like 23&Me which marketed itself as a hub to finding out all about your ancestry. However, concerns have been rising regarding where or not companies like these store your genes or get rid of them. There is an inherent lack of privacy when you ship off these boxes and what could happen after. Gene modification or editing could lead to exploitation of these results. When things like this become normalized, it opens the gates to further muddy the reality of what is bioethical and what is not.

Globally, there seems to be a selfish need to innovate no matter what suffers in the process, and, regarding the path it is taking, a world in which a company like Tyrell can thrive seems to be very likely

Humanity or Hybridization: Is the Gain Worth the Loss?

27 November 2024 Aryaam H.
Reading Time: 2 minutes

If I were given the chance to become a hybrid creature, I wouldn’t want to be one at all. Personally, I stand firmly against genetic modifications that are not necessary and especially one that raises ethical concerns about this. Furthermore, I do not find anything wrong with having a human body and being limited by our human capabilities. If we all arrived to be perfect then we would all die, as perfection does not exist. The arrogance and hubris that society would have to be steeped in to create something like this proves to me that I definitely would not trust any corporation to do even do a surgery of modification like that on my body

However, for the sake of a hypothetical, I think I would choose a bat. Bats are one of, if not the only, mammal that flies so I would still be a cross with a fellow mammal and be able to fly. In that case, I wouldn’t have to suffer through the New Orleans traffic (although I would assume other people would choose birds so maybe air traffic would exist? I am unsure.) Bats also use echolocation, which humans obviously dont. Humans only see visible light and due to our rods and cones, we are unable to visualize colors in the dark. However, because bats use ultrasound waves, echolocation allows them to see perfectly in the dark and would be amazing to utilize as a human, particularly because I would love to take more night photography. 

“Little brown bat wing inspection” by USFWS Headquarters is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

My wishes would mostly end there, though. I am not fond of physical transformations and despite other cool things bats can do, at what point would I lose my humanity? Flying and using echolocation would mean that I would have to have wings and different eyes. Would I even recognize myself in the mirror? Are you still a human if you’re a hybrid? I do not know and I do not wish to find out. Also, bats are one of the most common animals to have rabies and that is almost 100% fatal. I am not fond of dying because I wanted to fly and see in the dark.

Recent Posts

  • The Future of Human Augmentation
  • Breaking Boundaries: Janelle MonĂĄe’s Dirty Computer and Haraway’s Cyborg Vision
  • Rise of Cyberpunk Corporate Power? A Possible Reality or Completely Fictional?
  • Dirty Computer and the virus that differentiates us
  • The core of cyberpunk

Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024

Categories

  • Class Notes
  • Media Critique
  • Post of the Week
  • TIS: Season One
  • TIS: Season Three
  • TIS: Season Two
  • Uncategorized

AI AI Takeover Augmentation Blade Runner BladeRunner BP01 BP02 BP03 BP04 BP05 BP06 comic CorporatePower Cyberpunk cyborg Dirty Computer Ethics Film gender genz Human Human Augmentation Humanity Hybrid Hybridization Identity lgbtq neuromancer Novel Personal Time Podcast Post-Gender Reality Robots Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Series Soccer Sports Technology Transhumanism WFH Work Work From Home

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Spam Blocked

0 spam blocked by Akismet